Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

60 Excellent

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

1,711 profile views
  1. Fantastic work guys as usual! -Josh
  2. I'd love to see the options of RCWS and Flap Drooping as optional features. RCWS is roll CWS, in manual flight mode (Assuming the AFS levers are up and some other conditions are met) Aileron droop is in the performance improvement package McDD put out, including the 4 degree droop of outer ailerons with flaps/slats retracted, and the larger droop at the takeoff flap settings only (do not droop on landing) The KLM FCOMs + diagrams I submitted to y'all should have all that info in it Kind Regards, Josh
  3. Alright, that is quite unfortunate. I know PID tuning can be a bit time consuming at times but I still think it would be worth it. Best Regards, Josh
  4. Hi Collin, Thank you for the reply. I think it depends on how you have modelled it - I don't know as I don't have your code. If you have modelled it with a PID or similar control system for the FADEC, I think you are right - it could cause some problems that would require re-tuning the controller. But that may also eliminate some other issues such as the ATS sometimes undershooting/overshooting the speed target simply due to the nature of how PID control system works. Perhaps this is why. However, since you have a custom EPR calculation I suspect no PIDs are nessesary for
  5. Hi, I'd like to open a quick discussion about the FADEC here as I strongly believe the current response is incorrect (since V1.0 even) - this also explains why many people complained that taxiing was difficult. I want to make it clear that I am NOT talking about the response SPEED of the engines, as I see no issues with that. I did a lot of research into EPR FADEC systems and how engines with EPR as primary parameter respond. As you know, the EPR is not a linear function and you've modeled it correctly. However, where the mistake is, is that the throttle COMMAND is linear at the mome
  6. Would be awesome! I'm an MD-11 nut so I've been grasping my PMDG MD-11 for years now and would like something a bit more "up to date" Josh
  7. Wow.... that is dumb. I love their MD-11, and would love to have a new MD-11.... Kind Regards, Josh
  8. Octal450

    Boat Data?

    ... I knew it was a joke the second I opened it... lol
  9. PMDG MD-11 and LevelD 767, my 2 favorite addons from all time. Occasionally the Maddog MD-80. All working in P3D V3.
  10. Octal450

    Boat Data?

    I found it funny
  11. I do as well! MD-11 or maybe an MD-88/MD-90 would be nice. But I think they should get the 717 completely finished first
  12. Of course. I'm talking once the 717, is finished, stable, etc...
  13. Nice. I see you using the Tablet there, I for some reason never use it. I just use charts on my iPad mini, or printed ones. I prefer a stock cockpit. But it is very nice for managing the aircraft.
  14. Well, the MD-11 uses different avionics slightly. The 717 is more similar to the MD-10. They are similar, but far far from the same. But, yeah I'd like an MD-11 from them also
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.