Technotron

Realistic failures based on scenarios depicted in the aircraft SOP. Hot start simulation. A cockpit door that opens with integration from pacx.(Flight attendant delivers meals, or allows pilot to use the bathroom) Snartcars integration within the FMC(for activating booked flights, and exchanging info. Smartcars can send or receive flight plans to/from aircraft) Cargo specific version: Unsecured load failure Live animal transport factor that accounts for heavy animals freaking out during the departure phase) Cargo fire that can spread/damage other equipment, and a small chance the extinguisher fails to fully extinguishe the fire.

This happened in their discord. TheGroundedPilot04/08/2020 @ Collin Biedenkapp Will all products be supported for P3DV5? I know pacx and smartcars should interface as always, I am just mainly curious of the 717 and how it will act with Direct X 12. Fabio Almeida04/08/2020 @ TheGroundedPilot It’ll depend on the complexity in doing so, if it’s just a recompile, we can do that

Upon further research, I have found another issue with all our flight sims. Our default Magnetic data is out of date. You can update the data here and should help with the issue. https://www.aero.sors.fr/navaids.html grab the updated MagVar download

Use your mouse wheel to turn on adjust. All dial type switches use mouse wheel.

+1

On the fms, select NAV/RAD, you will see the ILS freq, but the course will be blank, add that in there by repeating the freq and adding the course heading

So I am on my way home and I have an idea for a new product that could add another level of realism on top of existing. The idea is a product to allow 2 users connecting over a network, to simulate pushback, and other tug movements. Imagine signing in on vatsim and being able to request a tug, you exchange up info, and tug is able to push aircraft from the gate. Now imagine landing with no hydraulics, if a tug is online, a controller in theory could dispatch it to move the aircraft, rather than requiring the player to disconnect. Now to implement wide adoption, have the pilot side utility free, but make tug side paid, or sell pilot side client as commercial and/or apart of the new smartcars. It's just an idea, I know the 717 has a pilot to pilot connection, but wasn't sure if that could be easily reversed engineered for a project like this. For those who might use it, what do you think?

I guess I need to submit a bug, the airports are hit or miss. on departure I will hear a pause while on arrival I will hear the the city. Were you planning on using the entire airport name? Also KRSW just says Florida

While under Dev, can we induce emergency situations that pacx creates so we can try them out, rather than wait for them to occur? I have flown a fair amount, but have yet to have an incident.

KATL - Atlanta KDFW - Dallas/Fort Worth KRSW - Fort Myers KDEN - Denver KSDF - Louisville KLAX - Las Angeles KDCA- Washington D.C. KSEA - Seattle KSFO - San Francisco KMIA - Miami KSLC - Salt Lake City KIAH - Houston KACT - Waco KSAT - San Antonio KAUS - Austin KTPA - Tampa KMCO - Orlando KFLL KPHX KLAS

Timestamps 48:50 1:27:10 The program is playing both sign on and off, as well as not replaying the message recorded... Bug or user error?

I am looking for a virtual airline that embraces this aircraft in their fleet. I am mostly just looking for the best community to interact with other pilots of this product. I have tried an Airtran Virtual, but it seems dead now. I know Delta is the biggest operator now, but even then, who is better for those who would like to take advantage of multicrew operations.